Shark Steam & Scrub S8001 Review: Effortless Deep Floor Cleaning

Shark Steam & Scrub S8001 steam mop review: powerful rotating pads, three steam modes, and standout hard floor cleaning for busy, high-traffic homes.

Price: $119.99

Original Price: $159.99

Rating: 4.5/5 (1825 reviews)

Pros

Powerful rotating scrub pads
Excellent on stuck-on stains
Multiple useful steam modes
Includes four washable pads
Easy to maneuver and steer
Headlights reveal hidden debris

Cons

Floor-only steamer
Bulky head in tight spaces
Average cord length
Not ideal for unsealed wood

If you’ve ever finished mopping only to realize your sealed hardwood still looks a little dull and grimy, the Shark Steam & Scrub S8001 feels like cheating. It doesn’t just glide a damp pad over the floor—the dual rotating pads genuinely scrub, and that difference shows up in how your floors look and feel under bare feet.

We’ve been running the S8001 across three very different homes: a 90% tile condo with two kids and a dog, an older house with original oak floors, and a small apartment with cheap vinyl plank the landlord swears is “luxury.” Across all three, the takeaway was the same: this is closer to a powered floor polisher than a typical steam mop.

Where the Shark S8001 Stands in a Crowded Steam Mop Market

Most steam mops are essentially steam wands attached to a microfiber sled. They rely on heat, light pressure, and you pushing back and forth. The S8001 approaches cleaning differently:

It uses dual motorized pads that rotate at high speed (Shark claims 150+ scrubs per minute) to physically agitate grime.
It offers three steam modes—Light, Normal, Deep—so you can dial in how aggressive it gets.
It’s explicitly built only for sealed hard floors: hardwood, tile, marble, stone, vinyl.

When we put it side by side with the Shark S1000 (a traditional stick-style steam mop) on dried coffee and tracked-in dirt, the S8001 needed fewer passes and less arm strength. The S1000 eventually got there, but you’re basically scrubbing manually. With the S8001, I mostly just steered; the head did the work.

Against the Bissell PowerFresh Slim (a more wand-like steamer with lots of attachments), the story was similar: the Bissell is more versatile for grout lines and above-floor jobs, but for large, flat floor spaces, the Shark’s rotating pads removed stuck-on stains faster and left a more uniform finish.

If your primary pain point is floor cleaning rather than multi-surface steaming, the S8001 is the better fit. If you want to sanitize grout, upholstery, and shower walls, you’ll hit its limitations quickly—it is strictly a floor tool.

Design Choices That Actually Matter in Daily Use

The S8001 looks like a typical upright steam mop at first glance, but a few design decisions stood out in testing.

Rotating head and pad system The circular pad hubs dominate the footprint. Our lab tech weighed the head at just over 5 lbs; you feel that weight if you lift it, but once on the floor the motorized rotation “floats” it. Everyone on the team noted the same thing: it feels heavier than basic mops when you carry it, but lighter to push in use.

Each pad attaches with a simple hook-and-loop underside. You get four reusable pads in the box, which we appreciated—enough for a full house clean plus backup while a set is in the wash. The pads are soft but dense; even after 20+ wash cycles on warm, our long-term tester didn’t see fraying or loss of thickness.

XL water tank and cord The tank is genuinely large for a steam mop. On Normal mode, our tests averaged about 22–25 minutes of continuous steam cleaning per tank, which was enough for a ~1,200 sq. ft. mixed hardwood/tile main floor. On Deep mode that drops closer to 15 minutes.

Refilling is straightforward: the cap is wide enough for a sink fill, and the unit heats up from cold in roughly 30 seconds. There’s no pump priming ritual or fiddly triggers—you just select a mode and go.

The cord length is adequate rather than generous. In our 1,600 sq. ft. test home, we needed two outlet changes to cover the main floor. Not a dealbreaker, but if you’re used to very long vacuum cords this feels average.

LED headlights Headlights on a mop sound silly until you use them. In dim hallways and under a dining table, the front LEDs made missed crumbs, hair, and splatters much easier to spot. They’re not a gimmick; they genuinely helped us see dried spills on dark tile that we would have otherwise skimmed past.

Living With the Three Steam Modes

In the lab we can talk about steam temperatures and pad saturation, but what matters at home is how each mode behaves.

Light mode: Our editor with older hardwood floors leaned on this mode the most. It’s warm enough for basic sanitizing (following the guidelines in the manual) and everyday dust/grime, but doesn’t leave the floor over-wet. On sealed but sensitive wood, Light struck the safest balance.
Normal mode: This became our default. On porcelain tile with grout lines, it cut through daily kitchen mess—oily splatters, dog drool, tracked-in dirt—without needing multiple passes. Floors were touch-dry in about 2–3 minutes.
Deep mode: This is the “weekend reset” setting. We used it on dried tomato sauce, sticky juice rings under bar stools, and mystery marks by the front door. I’d park the mop over the stain for 5–10 seconds, let the steam and scrubbing build, then do short overlapping passes. In almost every case, that was enough. Only baked-in grout stains still needed targeted spot treatment.

Importantly, all modes are controlled by a simple button on the handle, not a trigger you have to hold. Steam output ramps up smoothly; there’s no sputtering once warmed.

Real-World Performance: Stains, Streaks, and Sensitive Floors

Our hard floor specialist ran the S8001 through a repeatable set of messes on both tile and sealed hardwood:

Dried black coffee
Dried orange juice
Diluted tomato sauce
Mud tracked on from outside

On tile, the S8001 removed all of these in 1–3 slow passes on Normal or Deep. Tomato sauce required a short pre-steam soak in Deep mode, but once the pads had time to work, it lifted without needing harsh cleaners. No visible residue remained, and the tile dried quickly.

On sealed hardwood, we learned to be more conservative. The mop glides well, but Deep mode can leave wood slightly wetter than we’d like if you park in one spot for too long. We recommend:

Sticking to Light or Normal for routine cleans
Keeping the head moving over wood, especially near seams or thresholds
Testing an inconspicuous area first if you’re nervous

In our tests on a properly sealed oak floor, there was no cupping or dulling over a month of twice-weekly use. Finish still looked intact, and the boards actually looked less hazy versus using a traditional spray mop with cleaning solution.

As for streaking, the dual pad design helps. Because the pads are constantly rotating and absorbing, we saw fewer streaks than with flat-pad steam mops—especially on glossy tile. The exceptions were:

Very dirty pads that should have been swapped mid-clean
Cheap vinyl plank with a slightly uneven top layer, where some faint streaks are almost inevitable with any wet cleaning

Noise, Handling, and the “Effortless Glide” Claim

Steam mops don’t have loud suction motors, but the rotating pads do produce a soft mechanical hum. We measured around 60–62 dB at ear height—quieter than most vacuums, louder than a manual mop. You can hold a conversation while using it.

Handling is where the S8001 impressed nearly everyone. The swivel steering feels intuitive, and the spinning pads provide a bit of forward pull, similar to a self-propelled polisher but toned down. In long corridors and around island counters, the mop was easy to guide with one hand.

Where it’s less graceful:

Tight bathrooms with very narrow spaces between fixtures
High transitions or thresholds; the thick pad base can catch slightly

Under furniture, the low profile helps, but the bulky round head can’t reach as far as a slim rectangular steam mop. If you primarily need to clean under very low sofas and cabinets, that’s a trade-off you should consider.

Maintenance: Pads, Water, and Long-Term Durability

Shark includes four washable Dirt Grip pads. Our testers got into a rhythm of:

One pair for kitchen and high-traffic areas
One pair for bathrooms or backup

We washed them on warm and tumble-dried low. After several weeks and roughly 25–30 wash cycles, the pads were still absorbent with no obvious thinning or detachment of the hook-and-loop backing.

A few important maintenance points from our long-term testing:

Use distilled water if you have hard tap water. One of our homes with very hard water saw minor mineral flecks on the pad after a month. The unit still steamed fine, but for long-term health, we’d avoid feeding it straight hard tap.
Empty the tank if you won’t use it for a while. Leaving water in any steamer for weeks isn’t ideal.
Check the pads regularly; overly saturated or heavily soiled pads are the main cause of streaking.

As for durability, we can’t speak to multi-year lifespan yet, but there were no warning signs in our testing: no leaks, no fluctuating steam output, and the pad motors remained consistent.

How It Stacks Up to Other Options

Here’s how the Shark Steam & Scrub S8001 compares to a couple of well-known alternatives in the steam mop and hard-floor cleaning space:

Compared to Spray mops like the O-Cedar ProMist or Swiffer WetJet, the S8001 is more up-front cost but cheaper to run (no disposable pads, no proprietary solution) and delivers deeper cleaning and sanitizing through heat. The trade-off is needing an outlet and waiting ~30 seconds for steam.

Who Will Love the Shark S8001—and Who Won’t

We ended up recommending the S8001 most strongly to two types of people:

Households with large areas of tile, vinyl, or sealed hardwood, especially kitchens and main living areas that see daily traffic, pets, and spills.
Anyone who physically struggles with traditional mopping. The motorized scrubbing genuinely reduces effort; you steer instead of scrub.

You might want to skip it or look elsewhere if:

You have mostly carpet or rugs with only small patches of hard floor. A versatile steam cleaner with attachments will serve you better.
You’re in a very tight space with cramped bathrooms and lots of obstacles where a slimmer, rectangular head would maneuver more easily.
Your floors are unsealed wood or sensitive to moisture. This isn’t the right tool for raw or poorly finished wood.

For the price point around $120, our team agreed the Shark Steam & Scrub S8001 hits a sweet spot: it feels meaningfully more effective than basic steam mops without creeping into the price territory of full-blown hard floor washer-vacuums. If you want your steam mop to actually scrub, not just glide, this is one of the best values we’ve tested in the category.

View on Amazon